Ads by Nuffnang
-
Their Golden Years Just Became Dimmer
The sad stories : Effects of Madoff's Alleged Ponzi Scheme Have Pulled the 'Financial Rug' Out From Under Three Generations of a Family
Article written by Megan Greenwell from The Washington Post
The choice is really no choice at all: Either Ellen Siegler keeps working well beyond her planned retirement age or her mother, 98-year-old Sarah, who suffers from Alzheimer's disease, leaves her assisted living facility with no comparable place to go.
It's worse for Ellen's brother Irv Siegler. His home in Corning, N.Y., and other basic living expenses are covered, but the $781,000 he saved for his retirement is gone. And Ellen's son, now a junior at the University of Michigan? His parents had hoped to pay for law school so he could take a low-paying public interest job without worrying about debt, but that plan might be in jeopardy, too.
Although Ellen is affluent by any standard, Bernard L. Madoff's alleged $50 billion Ponzi scheme is rippling through three generations of her family as surely as the recession is devastating hundreds of thousands of people. She and her husband, Dev Barnes, 65, will not lose their home in Washington's Chevy Chase neighborhood to foreclosure or declare bankruptcy; in fact, none of her money was invested with Madoff. But her family is fundamentally altering its plans in an example of how the alleged swindle has reached beyond the very wealthy people who have received most of the attention so far.
"In one day, the financial rug was yanked out from under us," said Ellen, 64, an attorney with the Transportation Security Administration. "We're not rich, but we had carefully planned for retirement for many years, and now my mother cannot afford to pay next month's rent."
Madoff's client list, released by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court last month, does not distinguish between millionaires such as Larry King and someone like Sarah, whose last $300,000 is almost certainly gone. Its 13,567 entries include almost 250 from the Washington area, some of them charities and foundations. Collectively, the region's investors appear to have lost tens of millions of dollars.
The Sieglers are stunned by their losses but feel no sense of the shame others have expressed. "What do we have to be embarrassed about?" Irv asked. "We're victims -- the crime was committed against us. Madoff is the one who should be embarrassed for cheating so many people."
The Sieglers do not appear to belong on Madoff's client rolls, where it was not uncommon for individuals to have $10 million or even $100 million invested. For Sarah, who also has severe hearing loss and glaucoma, the money was paying the bills at the Aspenwood assisted living center in Silver Spring.
Yet in one respect, the Sieglers' Madoff story is similar to those of many of the multimillionaires on the list. It began on a golf course in West Palm Beach, Fla.
In the 1980s, Sarah and her late husband, Abe, retired to a tiny condominium in a Florida retirement community to enjoy a life of leisure in the sun. Abe was a high school dropout who worked for a handbag manufacturer in New York. He was too frugal to buy a house and spent less than $20,000 on the West Palm Beach condominium. One day on the golf course, a friend mentioned an investment opportunity that would earn modest but steady returns each year to supplement the Social Security checks he and his wife lived on.
Although wary of deals that sounded too good to be true, Abe thought it was a safe bet. He asked his friend to connect him to a banker who invested his money with Madoff, and soon he began receiving monthly statements chronicling his account's growth. Irv, a teacher, put about $30,000 in his own Madoff account in 1988.
Ellen and her husband considered doing the same but decided against it -- not because they thought they couldn't trust Madoff, but because Dev was worried about a conflict of interest. He worked for the Environmental Protection Agency, and some of the corporations Madoff invested in had lengthy pollution records.
"There were no red flags, and at that time, a 10 or 12 percent return was not particularly huge," said Irv, 63, now retired. "I was reviewing statements every month, and everything lined up to the penny. It's pretty amazing now that he could fake all that."
The day after Madoff was arrested in mid-December, Irv and Ellen were on the phone with each other by 6:30 a.m. Hoping against reason that there was some sort of mistake, Ellen sent a fax to Madoff's office, requesting a withdrawal from her mother's account, as she had many times before. This time, there was no response.
"There was shock and then denial," she said. "Every morning I woke up hoping it was all a bad dream. It took a while to realize it was really happening."
Since then, life has been a blur of government claim forms and a future of spending the money saved over 40 years on Sarah's needs instead of their own. Irv hopes to see a bit of his money returned, but because the family had regularly gotten some money from Sarah's account, they don't believe they will ever be reimbursed for the rest.
"We have to assume it's gone and plan based on that," Ellen said. "It's been a huge emotional load, but it's better than denial."
In January, Ellen and Dev, who is retired, met with their financial adviser to discuss whether they had enough money to pay Sarah's $5,000 in monthly bills without assistance from her Madoff account. The answer was unequivocal: Take her out of Aspenwood, the adviser said, and find an assisted living facility that accepts Medicaid. Next, they turned to a geriatric care consultant, who said that removing Sarah from her home of 12 years would have devastating effects on her health and mental state. Assisted living facilities typically do not accept Medicaid, and because Sarah is physically healthy, many nursing homes wouldn't take her.
After a family meeting, Ellen, Dev and Irv decided to ignore the financial advice and dig into their savings to split Sarah's bills. That means Ellen will not be able to retire in the next few years, as she had planned.
"It's like having a second child in college all of a sudden," she said. "But we had been planning for the first one practically since he was born, and we didn't get any advance warning on this."
Ellen and Dev are committed to insulating their only child, Ethan, from the effects of the loss. They still hope to contribute to his law school fund, but he will almost certainly have to take out student loans. Because he plans to enter public interest law rather than the more lucrative private sector, paying off the loans could take many years.
For Irv, who retired at 55, a pension and other savings will provide enough to live on. His Madoff investment, for which he saved every monthly statement over 20 years, was for traveling and upgrading his motorcycle collection, his two passions. He had withdrawn only small amounts from the account twice but planned to take about $50,000 a year beginning in 2010.
"I've never lived extravagantly, and I'm not going to start now," he said. "But I won't be able to pick up and visit friends in California all the time like I had planned."
Irv and Ellen agree that the silver lining is that their father is not around to see the results of his investment and that their mother does not know about the losses. "If she knew she couldn't pay for it herself, she'd pack up and walk out," Ellen said.
more
-
Busted: Alleged $70M mortgage fraud Ponzi scheme
Another sad story on the fraud Ponzi Scheme. I hope all of you can read this sad story ( article written by Gazette Staff )
Four people have been indicted for running a $70 million mortgage fraud Ponzi scheme through Maryland companies and spending the stolen money on big salaries, a fleet of chauffeured luxury cars and trips to the NBA All-Star game and Super Bowl in 2007.
A federal grand jury indicted them on Wednesday; the indictment was unsealed Monday, according to a statement from Rod J. Rosenstein, U.S. attorney for Maryland.
From 2005 to 2007, the defendants, through companies including Metropolitan Grapevine of Laurel, Metro Dream Homes, POS Dream Homes and POS DH LLC, targeted homeowner and home buyers. Their Dream Homes Program called for investors to provide at least $50,000 for each home, plus an "administrative fee" of up to $5,000, according to prosecutors. All told, more than 1,000 investors pumped about $70 million into the scheme.
The program promised to make the homeowner's future monthly mortgage payments, supposedly paying off the mortgage within seven years. Afterward, the homeowner and the company would each own a half interest in the home.
Furthermore, prosecutors say representatives of the program told investors that their payments would fund investments in automated teller machines, flat-screen televisions that would show paid business advertisements, and "Touch-N-Buy" electronic kiosks that sold telephone calling cards. The program was marketed in live presentations at luxury hotels in Maryland, Washington, D.C., and Beverly Hills, Calif. However, the ATMs and other marketing devices didn't generate any significant revenue, prosecutors said.
Instead, the defendants used the proceeds to pay themselves salaries of up to $200,000 a year; hire 10 chauffeurs to drive a fleet of luxury cars; and stay in luxury accommodations at the NBA and NFL games. The money also helped pay off investors from a previous failed ATM investment venture by one of the defendants, call Bankcard Group. Donations of up to $50,000 apiece were made to charities to give the scheme a more reputable appearance, prosecutors said.
"The indictment alleges that the defendants used slick marketing to conceal empty promises," Rosenstein said. "They convinced many victims to invest at least $50,000 by refinancing their existing homes or buying new homes at inflated prices, while claiming that Metro Dream Homes would repay the mortgages with revenue from profitable businesses. … Instead, the conspirators used some of the investors' money to repay earlier investors in the Ponzi scheme and spent the remainder on themselves."
"The effects of this wide-ranging mortgage fraud scheme are particularly disturbing within the backdrop of today's economic environment, said Thomas J. Harrington of the FBI's criminal, cyber, response and services branch.
The defendants are Andrew Hamilton Williams Jr., 58, of Hollywood, Fla., who was the founder and owner of Metro Dream Homes; Michael Anthony Hickson, 46, of Commack, N.Y., CFO; Isaac Jerome Smith, 46, of Spotsylvania, Va., president; and Alvita Karen Gunn, 31, of Hanover, vice president of operations. The information also alleges that Carole Nelson, 50, of Washington, was the CFO of POS Dream Homes.
Maryland officials issued a cease-and-desist order to Williams and the companies in August 2007, but the defendants continued to misrepresent themselves, prosecutors said. In challenging the order the following month in federal court, Hickson testified that the companies' success did not rely on new investor funds; prosecutors say he knew the only revenue source was, indeed, new investments.
The four defendants face up to 20 years in prison for the fraud conspiracy; 20 years on each of the 15 counts of wire fraud; and 20 years for conspiracy to commit money laundering. Smith also faces up to 30 years for bank fraud for allegedly misrepresenting his income to get a car loan on a new Bentley.
Prosecutors also want them to forfeit the $70 million.
The indictments come on the heels of the conviction of two Prince George's residents who pleaded guilty to defrauding mortgage lenders and struggling homeowners.
Cheryl Brooke, 52, of Upper Marlboro and Winston Thomas, 43, of New Carrollton pleaded guilty in U.S. District Court in Greenbelt, Rosenstein said in a statement.
"Cheryl Brooke and Winston Thomas stole the homeowners' equity by inducing financially-vulnerable homeowners to sell their properties and convert the sale proceeds to the use of the conspirators," Rosenstein said.
Homeowners were solicited to buy for-fee services for reducing debt and a legal plan, income tax return preparation services and bankruptcy petition preparation. Thomas, then a senior loan officer with a mortgage lender, and Brooke targeted individuals who owned and had equity in their homes, but were facing foreclosure, prosecutors said.
Brooke and Thomas face up to 20 years for conspiracy to commit wire fraud. Sentencing is scheduled for July 31. Brooke and Thomas also agreed to forfeit $2.23 million.
more
-
Viral Marketing 101- Info from tokexz.com
I have read the post from tokexz.com about Viral Marketing. Viral Marketing technique usually known as personal communication about a product between target buyers and their friends, relatives, and associates. Viral Marketing use many forms of media to reach out to the public without actually promoting the product by riding on in other forms.
For the post from tokexz.com, you can learn about to use this technique for your advantage to sell your own product. If you have this such teqnique or want to improve your viral skills, this post is great for you to read. ( Read here )
I also will share with you on the next post for my testing and the result when use viral marketing as my teqnique, if success.
Rizz ( http://rizmanma.blogspot.com)
(http://www.rizman.co.nr)
more
-
From onlineinternetmarketingreviews.com - 16 Ways to Make Money Online
I've found one blog that write about 16 Ways to make money online. (http://onlineinternetmarketingreviews.com). The URL quite long for me. I don't want to make a review for the website since I also don't know the owner for the blog. ( although the article claimed writen by mronline). I just want to make summarize on his article about 16 ways to make money online.
How you can get your money by using your computers? The writer has mention about 16 ways that you can easily to get money online.
1.PPC and CPM Advertising
PPC (Pay per Clicks ) and CPM ( Clicks Per Mill ) actually are the same types. Both types need you to paste a bit of HTML or XML code to your blogs, PPC ads pay you per number of time someone actually clicks on the ad; CPM pays you per number of impressions that their ads get on your site.
2.Affiliate Marketing
This style require you to sign up as membership, than you will promote the product through internet. If success, you will paid depending on your sales. ( Usually by commission )
3. Banner Advertising
Use along with PPC, CPM and affiliate marketing. Banner sometime can use animation or flashplayer, depending on your creavitivity.
For the others content, you can read the details from the website and it's quite difficult to me to write inside my blog ( I don't want somebody will blame me as plagiat guy ). The blog has include some links to others website for you to learn more about the 16 ways to make money online.
Kindly visit the blog that write for the article 16 Ways to Make Money Online by click here
RIZZ (http://rizmanma.blogspot.com)
more
-
Review to Reviewstream.Com (Get Paid to Review Programme)
ReviewStream.Com is another types of website that offered you to earn money just to make a review. They claim that you can review anything around you. So you are eligible to review about consumer products, services, hi-technology or even you can review about your girlfriends, family or your stupid boss. However, you need take your own responsibilities if your review has been accepted and has read by the target audience.
When you surfing to their website, you will see 2 sections. You can act as writter or just want to read a review. If you as writter, as I said before you can write anything that you like to write. However, Review Stream has give to you some specific title that you can earn more money, such as review for electronics, travelling and medicine. You will earn USD2.00 per review and if your review has been read and get voted by the target audience, you will get USD0.10 depending on how many people has read your review.
As writter, Review Stream not allow you to do plagiat from others article, although from same website. They simply can ban you and take the legal action to you if make the plagiat articles.
I have no idea whether want to try the website yet and need futher study on their payment, because in Review Stream website the payment has no information available.
You can try them here.
more